That "bounce back" patent of Apple's iPhone, is a simple translation of some basic mathematical formulas from the days of using Flash for UI interaction on the web -- stuff that you'd pick up from reading any Flash-based animation book.
The layout of icons in a tile fashion, as anyone who uses Android knows, is not the primary means of interacting with the phone; using your widgets and quick-launch icons on your home screens, is. But the layout of icons, when wasn't that a design that was obvious? The old PalmOS phones had rows of icons; almost every feature (read: non smartphone) phone has rows of icons. And when Apple argued that a phone icon from anyone else should not look like a phone, I had to shake my head in disgust. What next, a design patent for a light bulb representing a light bulb or an idea?
The shrillness of Apple fanbois is absolutely vile, because of the stupidity of their ignorance. You would have thought that Apple invented the idea of a row of icons, if you listened to those Apple fanbois -- I think most of them are probably too young to know anything about the Palm Pilot.
Compare Android screens from mycolorscreen. |
Android is much more flexible and customizable than iOS, period.
Apple is just a screen of icons, and one that has been uglified by its users. |
You can't get to a Neon Genesis phone from the iOS or Windows Phone platforms.
NTT DoCoMo phone, via Gadget City |
No comments:
Post a Comment