Sunday, June 30, 2013

The absolute, worst argument against gay marriage.

I have to wonder why anyone takes the Heritage Foundation seriously, but more so now with Jim DeMint at the helm.  For this morning on MTP, he offered what is the absolute worst argument against gay marriage:  Because it suppresses the rights of people who believe that gay marriage is wrong.

By Jim DeMint's logic, we the people who support the rights of free, black men and women (re: 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments), trampled on the rights of racist bigots.

The problem with Jim Demint's argument is, is that gay marriage does not impose a toll on those who do not support gay marriage.  It does not cost non-gay families personal fees, a loss of personal freedoms, a loss of religious freedoms, or a loss of personal dignity.

Now, I know that some people seem to think that this will lead to the legalization of polygamy or to marriage between humans and non-humans.  So how does this break down?

The reason why we have laws against polygamy, is because polygamy has long been associated with the suppression of freedoms of women, particularly female children, who were married off to men, especially those of wealth.  In this, polygamy reinforces unequal rights.  But at some point in the future, when women have gained earning parity and the glass ceiling has been completely and permanently shattered, anti-polygamy laws will no longer be required or seem important in the support of equality.

We might yet allow marriage between humans and non-humans.  Of course, we haven't yet found aliens from other planets, but if we meet aliens from other planets, why wouldn't we be allowed to intermarry?  It's absurd that we wouldn't be allowed to, after all, 50 years of science fiction have pointed towards that belief -- think Spock.

But can you marry your dog or a giraffe?  Well, again the problem remains that of rights.  Non-humans on this planet have long been assigned the designation of property, and their rights have been assigned to their owners and their would-be owners.  If you think about it, your pet dog doesn't have the ability to defend its rights -- if granted -- in a court room; it must be assigned to a human -- its owner -- or interested party.  In essence, the point still comes back to the subversion of rights.  If all non-humans on Earth were granted equal human rights, their rights would be easily trampled upon because those non-humans do not have the personal ability to defend their rights in court (bark once if your human husband mistreated you?).

That does not mean that at some point in the future, we couldn't grant interspecies marriage equality.  After all, at some point we might be able to both boost the intelligence of non-humans, coupled with an ability to communicate with ease with non-humans.  Which of course means that you'll never be able to marry your Ken or Barbie Doll.

Bottom line: Gay marriage may seem immoral or distasteful to many, but it doesn't impede or otherwise trample on the rights of those who find it immoral or distasteful, no matter how you slice it.

Saturday, June 29, 2013

I regret that I have but one brain to use.

Life demands choices: Aside from daily life activities, I can either design or blog.  But this week there was a new entry to the competition of my time: CNET's Daniel Terdiman's daily Road Trip picture challenge.
A spatial exploration and some planters

Design -- Half the time, design means work.  For example, this past week it was much about work.  But other times I spend a lot of time exploring ideas and designs.  I have a Pinterest board dedicated towards saving images of things that I'd like to explore, but more often I just suddenly find inspiration to explore some thought in my head -- this spatial study was from last week, and the planters from the week before.

Blog -- If I blog, I would prefer that it were an exercise in research and analysis, but those posts require an hour or more, from research, analysis and composition.  I like doing these types of posts, and this week was filled with big news that deserved a lot of attention, but I just didn't have the time to do them proper, so I simply skipped out on all of SCOTUS' decisions and the Texas abortion filibuster, among many other things.

Road Trip picture challenge -- I got hooked last Summer.  It's one of the few things in life that I feel properly challenged, instilling a panic within me, of not finding the answer in time.  Like blogging, I do it for a reason: It forces me to be creative in searching, trying to connect the dots and analyze photos to find clues.  Knowing how to find answers is more important than knowing everything, because, well, no one can ever know everything, but not many people know how to find what they're looking for.

Anyway, that's why I barely posted anything this past week.

comScore May 2013: No good news for WP and Blackberry.

comScore released their May 2013 US smartphone market share numbers today, showing that Blackberry's fall resumed after what seemed like a possible bottom.  Oh well.

Top Smartphone Platforms

3 Month Avg. Ending May 2013 vs. 3 Month Avg. Ending Feb. 2013

Total U.S. Smartphone Subscribers Age 13+

Source: comScore MobiLens
Share (%) of Smartphone Subscribers
Feb-13 May-13 Point Change
Total Smartphone Subscribers 100.0% 100.0% N/A
Android 51.7% 52.4% 0.7
Apple 38.9% 39.2% 0.3
BlackBerry 5.4% 4.8% -0.6
Microsoft 3.2% 3.0% -0.2

Note that neither Blackberry nor Microsoft show any signs of a bright future.  For three straight months now, WP has been stuck at 3.0% market share in the US -- a bottoming without any upswing -- while Blackberry continued to decline, albeit at a slower rate than last year.

Zoom in closer to the last 12 months, and it seems that Android has found its groove at the top of the market with very limited movement.
A closer look at the last four months show that market share has been relatively stable, even as the number of smart phone owners continues to expand.  It's starting to look like Blackberry and Microsoft responded too late and too slowly to the rapidly changing market.  In the case of Blackberry, BB10 came out after smart phones surpassed the 50% share of the US mobile market (Sept 2012).

You like sobering stats, don't you?  If overnight the remaining non-smart phone mobile users in the US were to switch to a smart phone, and were split evenly between Windows Phone and Blackberry, both platforms would still be behind Android and iPhone.  Now, obviously that scenario would never happen, but it points to just how daunting it is for either WP or Blackberry to get back into the game, and why speed matters.

In a year from now, smart phones will increase their share of the total mobile market, and Android and iPhones will continue to outsell and dominate not just the US market but the global market as well.  And for all the talk that Microsoft is picking up its cadence and moving faster, the problem still remains: They have to move faster than Google, not just faster than their previously sloth-like pace.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

John Boehner's twisted world -- a red hot one, apparently.

In a critique of President Obama's climate policy announcement, House Majority John Boehner said that, "These policies, rejected even by the last Democratic-controlled Congress, will shutter power plants, destroy good-paying American jobs and raise electricity bills for families that can scarcely afford it."

Half-truths, if that.

  • " rejected even by the last Democratic-controlled Congress" -- More like, unable to get past a filibuster threat by Republicans.  Oh those Republicans...they love to do nothing but talk about how they aren't responsible for anything.
  • "will shutter power plants" -- For every dirty power plant that gets shut down, a clean one will replace it.  Energy is regulated, insofar that power companies get to recoup all of their investment costs and receive a guaranteed, government-backed profit margin.  If a power company wants to stay in business, it'll have to build clean power plants, or else get shut out by others.
  • "destroy good-paying American jobs" -- Increased power pricing creates incentives for power savings and higher efficiency.  And, for every job destroyed by closing a dirty power plant, a new, high-paying job is created in support of clean technology.  They never talk about the loss of jobs from environmental disasters from dirty power, such as the leaking XL pipeline or the tailing pon spills from coal plants, do they?
  • "raise electricity bills for families that can scarcely afford it" -- One way or another, climate change will affect your pockets; the do-nothing solution is akin to Nero fiddling while Rome is burning.  The solution is to increase the minimum wage to a living wage, of course.  If you're earning below a living wage, your employer is passing the wage difference onto government in the first place.  It's why states like Alabama continuously top the charts in per-capita federal spending.

Why Treasury yields jumped and stock prices flopped.

I've heard and read some silly follies about why US Treasury yields jumped while stocks dropped last week after the Fed announced that they expected to ease QE later this year.

John Boehner provided the most bone-headed commentary, suggesting that it had to do with US overspending.

Boehner's assertion is ridiculous because, as I noted last week, we have actually lowered our federal debt by slower spending growth with higher tax revenues, such that hitting the debt ceiling has been put off for several months.  Further, as the CBO noted previously, the deficit continues to rapidly shrink, which means that we could reach a balanced budget soon, simply by doing nothing but passing budget continuing resolutions.

Others suggested that the markets feared that slowing of QE would result in lower economic growth, or even a reversion to recession.

If the markets really feared a slowdown, it would push yields down even further, not higher -- a matter of a long history of cause-effect -- regardless of the direction of the stock market, but usually aligned to drops in the prices of stocks.  Since the yields shot up, it means that people were dumping their bonds into other resources.

What else happened?

Stock prices fell around the world, not just in the US; besides US Treasuries, all levels of bond prices fell around the world, including German bonds, municipal bonds and corporate bonds (and of course, all those bond funds); commodities all fell, including gold, platinum and oil.  Even TIPS have suddenly flipped to positive yields -- something that hasn't happened in nearly 1 1/2 years.

But there was one notable exception to rising yields: 1 month T-bills.

Reading the signals correctly, investors do not expect runaway inflation or economic growth.  They are not expecting the economy to shrink, but they're also unsure about the effects of announcing ahead of time, that QE might end, except that big hedge bonds just know that they're in trouble if they do not move out of bonds ahead of the end of QE.

So... naturally many investors have sought temporary quarters in the short-term safety of 1 month T-bills.  And that's the answer as to why Treasury yields jumped and stock market prices dropped.

10 minutes of Under the Dome was enough for me.

CBS' latest show, Under the Dome in a word: Lame.

Firstly, I like Denny's, but the coffee and food are better at any local cafe in Portland, and a lot of other towns.  And breakfast at Ikea is cheaper.  ;)

Secondly, the scene where a cow gets sliced in half by the dome, is ridiculous; further down in the parting shot you see the barn that has also been sliced, but reveals a ragged foot-wide gap.  So silly.  Physics doesn't work that way, but then again, they treated the cow differently than the barn, which implied that they forced the physics in the computer rendering and animation.

Thirdly, Simpsons did it.  Nuff said.


The Simpsons Movie is superior in all respects.

Latest Youtube playlist: 1977 - 1984 rock.

The 1977 - 1984 rock compilation: Two hours of some of my favorite rock music, with just a hint of some pop and punk mixed in.  The sort of music you play when you've got a house party.  It all started with one of my favorite classic rock songs of all time -- Tusk -- when it hit me that I should compile a video list of rock songs.



Here's the full listing:

  • Boston -- More Than a Feeling
  • Steely Dan -- Hey Nineteen
  • Pablo Cruise -- Love Will Find a Way
  • Kansas -- Dust in the Wind
  • The Doobie Brothers -- What a Fool Believes
  • The Knack -- My Sharona
  • Pink Floyd -- Another Brick in the Wall
  • Foreigner -- Urgent
  • Styx -- Too Much Time on My Hands
  • Fleetwood Mac -- Tusk
  • Billy Joel -- It's Still Rock and Roll to Me
  • Queen -- Another One Bites the Dust
  • Genesis -- Abacab
  • AC/DC -- Back in Black
  • The Romantics -- What I Like About You
  • Hall and Oates -- You Make My Dreams Come True
  • Def Leppard -- Rock of Ages
  • The Clash -- Rock the Casbah
  • Joan Jett -- Bad Reputation
  • Loverboy -- Working for the Weekend
  • Stray Cats -- Rock This Town
  • ZZ Top -- Gimme All Your Lovin'
  • The Police -- Every Breath You Take
  • Toto -- Africa
  • Van Halen -- Hot for Teacher
  • The Fixx -- One Thing Leads to Another
  • Ratt -- Round and Round
  • Sammy Hagar -- I Can't Drive 55
  • The Cars -- Magic
  • Huey Lewis and the News -- The Heart of Rock and Roll
Total time: 2 hours and 2 minutes.

Enjoy.

Monday, June 24, 2013

Losing weight, the easier way.

So far, I've lost 2" off my waist in two months (about 10 weeks) -- I didn't measure my weight before I started this diet because weight loss wasn't actually my first concern, so I have no real means of tracking how much weight I've lost.  I didn't increase my exercise regiment; in fact, I barely exercise, except to walk my usual ~5 miles a week or so.

After watching Michael Mosley on PBS (back in mid-April) with his examination on dieting, I was won over by the 5:2 fast diet.  If you haven't heard by now, you fast two days a week (~500 calories a day, twice a week for women and ~600 calories a day for men), and eat whatever and whatever amount of food you normally would eat, the other five days.



600 calories may seem tiny (1/4 of your normal daily maximum recommended intake of 2400 calories for men), but the one thing you realize is that certain foods are rich in nutrients and volume but low in calories: veggies.  Also, low-fat meats such as chicken breast or even certain sausages in moderate rates, are low in calories.  Of course, I've been a bit loose on the 600 calorie cap lately, but even so, the weight comes off.

The inverse of low-calories, as you might expect, are fats and fruits (because they're loaded with natural sugar).  So, a single banana is 100+ calories, and an avocado (rich in plant fats) is 300+ calories, while a giant bowl full of vegetables is more like 25 calories.  You could eat your regular diet on your fasting days, but then you'd be stuck with much smaller portions.  Therefore, it's easier to lean vegetarian on fasting days.

Something I've learned: If done right, a half-portion of ramen noodles in soup with vegetable condiments is well under 300 calories, and a solid meal, compared to a single avocado.  I'd never before counted calories, but now I'm quite cognizant of what's high and what's low, just by the ingredients.

A huge boost recently fell into my lap: Google searches now give you quick access to caloric counts and nutritional information of different foods.  It's not perfect -- some oddities exist -- but for the most part, it's made tracking calories on fast days a lot simpler.

I've decided that separating fasting by two days is slightly easier than just one day separated, and back-to-back is just about impossible and something you're not supposed to do, anyway.

It's absolutely remarkable how much easier the 5:2 diet is, compared to trying to eat better and exercise regularly.  Long story short: 20 years ago I was successful in losing a lot of weight, but it was no walk in the park.  This time around, it's a lot easier and more than twice as quick to lose weight, even though I'm much older, which is not something I really expected.  Of course, weight loss wasn't my first concern -- I was primarily concerned about blood sugar levels and diabetes.  The video from PBS is no longer available, but the main point was that fasting twice a week dramatically altered one's body chemistry such that a number of signals normally associated with disease that leads to early death, disappeared, all without drugs.  I previously mocked modern pharma and their drugs.

I don't mean to keep this diet up for life; once I get down to my preferred weight, I'll move to a more forgiving regiment of fasting just once a week, though I'll probably switch it back to twice-a-week fasting around the holidays.  By the way, once you lose enough weight, your body no longer feels too tired to exercise, so that's been a boon, too.

It is just amazing, I kid you not.  You don't even need to be perfect.

Friday, June 21, 2013

The exploding federal debt.

If we don't stop our out of control spending, we'll become Greece!  Oh wait.

Not that we won't eventually hit the debt ceiling this year, but the date has been pushed back to Fall.  As you can (sort of) see, we actually have lower total debt right now than roughly two months ago.

As a matter of fact, it was April 30, 2013, when we peaked at $16,828,845,497,183.90.  Yesterday, June 19, 2013, our federal debt was $16,738,642,755,073.30.

We owe $90,202,742,110.60 less, yesterday, compared to April 30, 2013!

So where did that come from?  A good chunk of it was the sequester, but also, as the CBO duly noted and as we've seen in the BEA data, income tax revenue has increased substantially as the economy has recovered.  Problem is, the bulk of the sequester really hits during the Summer and through September (the end of the federal fiscal calendar year).  If we're lucky and the economy heats up enough to absorb spending cuts without sending us back into near-zero growth or a shrinking economy, we might get to put off the debt ceiling for another few months.

Flat design overload.

It hit me this morning: I can't stand pastel colors with flat design.  I love the 80s, but not the pastels so much.  I like rich, dark tones set against bright primary colors.  Please, no pasthellish flat designs.


The cost and size of the border surge, and why it's dumb.

A few days ago, the CBO issued a report showing that the current Senate comprehensive immigration reform would save the US $197B over a decade, and $700B over two decades.  Of course, you can count on Republicans to screw the pooch.

Now they've decided to add onto the comprehensive immigration bill an estimated $30B to $50B for extra border protection, doubling the size of the border patrol to around 41,000 agents -- that's larger than the FBI.  That's on top of the $18B already being spent on all immigration-related activities.  According to Senator Lindsey Graham, it'd be enough for one agent every 1000 feet, 24 hours a day.

DHS Report, Sept 2012

So, Republicans are considering doubling an agency -- border patrol -- and spending an additional tens of billions of dollars for what amounts to a shrinking population crossing the border.  Maybe that makes sense in Washington DC, but from where I'm sitting, it looks dumb.

On top of that, if bringing in more aliens into legal citizenship means increased GDP and lower deficits, why spend $50B to try and thoroughly block others from coming into the US?  Essentially, the surge of naturalized aliens would help compensate for the Social Security and Medicare shortfalls of the baby-boomer retirement.

Instead, Republicans are arguing for more spending and lower tax revenue.  Hey wait...same old, same old!

Google Street View: Midway Islands.

Well, just Midway Island.  Street view, of birds, old buildings and, of course, Midway Mall...with birds.  I'd be willing to live there, except no dogs allowed.





Thursday, June 20, 2013

Earbits.

Ever since I read this Lifehacker post on Earbits, I've been playing around with it on my GS-II phone.  So far, not bad, but as I see it, there is one terrible flaw: It requires Facebook in order to extend functionality of the app such as saving favorite tracks.

I think this a terrible flaw because, well, I don't use Facebook.  And anyway, they only have an Android app for the moment, which seems ironic, don't you think?  If you've got an Android, you've got a Google account.

It's not enough to stop me from using it though...it is a completely free radio service focused on discovery, after all.  Oh, and you can listen via your browser, too.

And yes, there are several sub-categories under Classical music, with of course my favorite: Romantic Era.


A backlog of photos

Stormy weather..
Noctilucent vapor trails
Sunset with a hint of noctilucent trails
Aww rats!
Relax, don't do it, when you want to, go do it.

Racist Republican attacks fellow Republican.

Montgomery County (Illinois) Republican chair Jim Allen viciously attacked a fellow Republican (Erika Harold) seeking the nomination of Illinois' 13th Congressional seat, in an email:
"Rodney Davis will win and the love child of the D.N.C. will be back in Shitcago by May of 2014 working for some law firm that needs to meet their quota for minority hires.
The truth is Nancy Pelosi and the DEMOCRAT party want this seat. So they called RINO Timmy Johnson to be their pack mule and get little queen to run.
Ann Callis gets a free ride through a primary and Rodney Davis has a battle.
The little queen touts her abstinence and she won the crown because she got bullied in school,,,boohoo..kids are cruel, life sucks and you move on..Now, miss queen is being used like a street walker and her pimps are the DEMOCRAT PARTY and RINO REPUBLICANS…These pimps want something they can’t get,,, the seat held by a conservative REPUBLICAN  Rodney Davis and Nancy Pelosi can’t stand it..
Little Queenie and Nancy Pelosi have so much in common but the one thing that stands out the most.. both are FORMER QUEENS, their crowns are tarnished and time has run out on the both of them."
 Uhm.  He's upset that a former Miss America winner who graduated from Harvard Law School is running against the candidate he'd backed, because she's black.

You can see why the GOP gets no love in the polls from minorities.

President of gay conversion evangelical group apologizes.

I think this is rather huge.  Alan Chambers, president of Exodus International announced that they were closing their main organization, allowing chapters to continue on as they wish, but also apologizing for the pain they had caused over the years.
"I do not have any desire to fight you on your beliefs or the rights that you seek. My beliefs about these things will never again interfere with God’s command to love my neighbor as I love myself."
That pretty much sums it all up, doesn't it?  You don't have the right to tell someone that what they're doing is morally unjustified, when what they're doing has no impact on anyone else -- you let God decide.

It's a remarkable epiphany for someone to understand this, in my opinion.

Living connected.

I know that in this age of domestic spying, the popular suggestion is to live in a disconnected, tangled cloud of a thousand services, each requiring its own login and account.  The point being, that with a multi-layer approach, one must work hard to connect the dots of the different services you use, to look into all of your activities.  And I suspect that paranoid folks already do this.

But, I'm just an average Joe whose main concern is to not have to jumble a thousand passwords.  You and I use our browser cookies (some of you might not really understand how cookies work, but that's beside the point) to save our login information, whenever we can.   We leave tracks of our digital lives everywhere -- I do it on purpose, but somewhat subversively, to see how good people are at finding the digital me.

Whenever possible, I'd prefer not to have to log in to every service, but let's face it: No one company has a complete ecosystem in which you can fully live in, though Google comes close.  So, the next best thing is to find an online service that allows you to access and keep track of many of your cloud services by simply linking them: Jolicloud.

I've mentioned Jolicloud before, and the reason why I'm blogging about it tonight, is to report back that in the short time that I've used them, they've added a dozen connected services including tonight's addition:  Evernote.

So now, I've got Box, Google+, Google Drive, Picasa, Flickr, Youtube, Dropbox, Evernote and Pocket all lined up in my Jolicloud.  Here's my wish list: Google Play Music, Twitter, Google Keep, minutes.io (or something like it) Yahoo, Gmail and Outlook mail, and Pinterest.

It's good to live connected, and to have those connections tied into as few locations as possible.  Just pin Feedly and Jolicloud and three-quarters of my life is present and accounted for.

Sure, being connected makes it easier for the NSA to track you.  But until something goes bump in the night, I'm not going to become paranoid and wear tin foil hats.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

QE = future inflation? What?

Watch the somewhat longish video of Rick Santelli's rant...somewhere in between there, I think there was a guest that he was speaking to.



In one of his complaints, Rick's upset that because of QE, at some point in the next 30 years or so, when the Feds decide to unload their balance sheet of Treasuries, inflation will tick up.

Well, maybe.  For starters, the Feds could hold onto their Treasuries to the date of maturation, at which point they could opt to simply purchase new Treasuries.

But the odd thing about his rant, is that the flood purchases of Treasuries by the Feds, was supposed to result in near-term inflation, not long-term inflation risks, so the Austrian-minded conservatives told us.  Rick and the Austrians didn't get their near-term inflation, so now he and others have moved on to long-term inflation risks.  In both cases (the ramp up to QE and the ramp down from QE), Rick is telling us that the markets will be flooded with cheap money to drive inflation up, which is a bit of a head-scratcher, don't you think?

Now, it's becoming clearer why QE hasn't helped to pick up the economy: lack of demand and lack of trickle-down.  Most middle-class and poor people have few assets beyond a simply-managed 401K or pension, if that.  The inexpensive access to cheap money didn't trickle down to them, which would have otherwise given rise to inflation and spending.  As others have noted, it would have been easier to create inflation by simply dropping cash from helicopters, than to try to do the same with QE.

And no, this is not the same as Hugo Chavez handing out free food.  With free money, you're using it to buy things you need or want, which then stimulates hiring and investment -- something that those Bush rebates were meant to do.  With free food, you fill empty stomachs and little else.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

"Buyer to do due diligence" and some other hilarious euphemisms.

In the process of looking for either empty lots or good deals on houses, I came across the "Buyer to do due diligence" warning.  It was obvious why: The lot had a tree with a 10'+ circumference right in the middle of the lot.  This prompted me to compile some of the observed euphemisms of the real estate trade.

"Buyer to do due diligence"
That actually means, "I'M NOT TELLING YOU ABOUT SOME DEFECT OR CRITICAL LIMITATION!"

"Fixer-upper"
Really, one look and you know that it actually means, "STRUCTURAL PROBLEMS EXIST, REQUIRING LOTS OF MONEY!"

"Quaint"
This can either mean, "SMALL!" or "GRANDMA LIVED HERE AND NEVER UPDATED ANYTHING IN 30 YEARS!"

"Updated"
My least favorite term, this almost always means, "WE FIXED IT UP ALL PRETTY WITH CHEAP DIY STUFF AND EXPECT IT TO SELL FOR A LOT!"

"Solid bones"
Ha.  This one means, "THE ONLY THING GOOD ABOUT THIS HOME IS THE FRAMING!"

"Cozy" and "Pied-à-terre"
These are interchangeable adjectives that describe either, "TWO BEDROOM HOME IN A ONE BEDROOM SIZED HOME!" or, "ONE BEDROOM HOME IN A STUDIO SIZED HOME!" or, "HOME ESPECIALLY SIZED FOR A SINGLE MIDGET!"

The Fields at night.

Two weeks ago I got the ISS on my cell phone video -- I'm sure people thought I was weird looking up into the sky pointing my cell phone -- but the quality is not so good, so I thought I'd make my way outside and see if I could photograph it.

So tonight, I was outside at The Fields park in the dark, hoping to catch either the ISS or an Iridium satellite flare, but I missed both, somehow.  I think I'll have to try closer to dusk.

Instead, I got some photos of The Fields, with parts of the Centennial Mills inside.  They apparently just painted the water tower on Friday, because it was full of graffiti on Thursday.



Thursday, June 13, 2013

SCOTUS and the gene patent ruling.

The SCOTUS unanimously ruled that human DNA cannot be patented, but that which is artificially created (cDNA) can be.  After researching and reading up on DNA, cDNA and RNA, I have two thoughts:

It doesn't make sense.
How can cDNA (complementary DNA) be patentable, if the cDNA of (in this case) BCRA-1 and BCRA-2 (breast-cancer genes) is merely cloned DNA of BRCA-1 and BRCA-2?  It would seem that the SCOTUS is setting itself up for further challenges as now, companies and individuals will be rushing to patent the cDNA of a multitude of genes in the human body.  I understand that companies need to see payday in order to pursue the necessary research to figure out the switches in our DNA, but you know, this is a little ridiculous.

Man's creation?
Odd don't you think, that the group of conservatives on the Court would rule that the genesis of DNA dictates whether or not it can be patented?  It goes against the concept of God and the power of creation in the strictest interpretation, that any part of the building blocks of life could be patented.  Under the laws of Nature, which are by definition the laws of God, manipulation of a biological construct is His domain.  That is to say, whether or not a synthetic means towards DNA copying works or doesn't, is entirely up to God / Nature and not by the will of man.  The SCOTUS even hinted at the role God / Nature plays in the process of cloning DNA, saying that, "Its order of the exons may be dictated by nature, but the lab technician unquestionably creates something new when introns are removed from a DNA sequence to make cDNA."

Now, if you read that carefully, the SCOTUS is saying that, yes, God's / Nature's rules dictate whether or not the design is proper, but the lab technician is in his own right, Master of this creation: cDNA.  Now, if you're not religious, you're probably just rolling your eyes.  But if you are religious, then the conservative members of the SCOTUS are heretics for suggesting that Man can be credited as the Creator, right?

The changing face of Snowden.

I'm going to say it: Snowden just doesn't know when to shut up.  By talking to the South China Morning Post about US military hacking, he's now aided a foreign country in ways that his leaking of domestic spying didn't involve.  In other words, he's made himself open to charges of Treason and sown the seeds of his doom as a result.

He liberated the hidden truth about domestic spying, but it's one thing to find out our government has been lying to us, and another thing altogether to learn that our government has been fighting foreign countries who'd be more than happy if we were subsumed.  He's given others leverage against the US and its closest allies.

He's about to lose his biggest allies in political circles, and the conversation may shift away from domestic spying and the 4th Amendment, to a treasonous American who placed our deepest secrets in jeopardy.

How sad.

Blogger app for Android

Long story short, I searched and found a Blogger app for Android, since I thought I'd try to do more on my tablet.

First attempt to post didn't work however.  It must have to do with trying to upload a large photo from my tablet.  It crashed the app as soon as I tried to upload that first post from my tablet. It saved the post as a draft, but kept crashing each time I tried to upload.  It wouldn't show up as a draft on my desktop either, so it's not auto saving like the web browser version does.

I read earlier that the app was updated to support tablets, so this was probably serendipity.

Or bad luck... if this never uploads.



UPDATE:
Okay, so I got it to update on the second try, but then it lost all my labels and it decided to use its own formatting and not my blank spaces.  Seems like some big bugs.

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

The NSA's spying, populism and the Pew poll.

Nothing speaks volumes about one's bravery, than to voice your opinion on a contemporaneous subject before a poll comes out on it.  Case in point: House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell before and after the Pew poll.

Last Week Boehner:
"The tools were given to the administration and it’s the administration’s responsibility to outline what these tools are and how they’re being used. And so I’m hopeful we’ll see those answers soon."
This Week Boehner:
"He’s a traitor...When you look at these programs, there are clear safeguards.There are no Americans that are going to be snooped on in anyway unless they’re in contact with some terrorist around the world."
Last Week McConnell:
"[No comment,] Not right now."
This Week McConnell:
"I hope that he is prosecuted to the full extent of the law."
Note that I had this prepared five hours ago, but I had to wait for Mitch McConnell to issue his statement this week...you know, the one that I knew was coming, condemning Edward Snowden following the Pew Poll's release.  Certain establishment politicians you see, are that predictable.

Enjoy the political chickens while you can.

My solution to the Vista Bridge suicide problem.

Yet another unfortunate suicide off Portland's Vista Bridge, followed by continued discussions about how to prevent it, including specifically, barriers -- it seems like a story that keeps repeating itself a few times every year.  Barriers are problematic in two ways: Cost and visibility.  I think there's a better way, though.

1" ~ 1.5" metal spike strips.

It may sound flippant, but there's some psychology at work, here.  As Johnny Mandel wrote, "suicide is painless", or as I suspect the meaning is, "suicide is pain less".  The mindset behind suicide is that it ends suffering; the chosen means to an end is almost always limited in pain.

So what if, in the act of committing suicide, you had to endure severe physical pain, as in, multiple sharp stabs?

Yes, I know that if someone is committed to suicide, there isn't much in the way of stopping them.  But, let's say you bring in metal spike strips onto the top surface of the guard rails that are already conducive to standing / sitting on top, with its wide face?  If you upgrade the bridge to meet ADA (technically speaking, ANSI A117.1) you'd introduce a height-appropriate handrail that would prevent accidental injuries (though you couldn't stop a stupid person from harming themself).  Now you have a layer of tremendous physical pain that one must endure, and with its sudden infliction, the natural human response is to recoil and reject it.

It won't prevent all suicides in Portland -- that's something that requires several layers of intervention -- but I believe that it will prevent people from jumping off Vista Bridge. Because it is relatively modest in physical size and can be coated appropriately, it will naturally blend into the overall form of the historical bridge's design, at least from most perspectives.  Up close, obviously, it will seem distracting, but not many people bother to notice the small details up close.

Again, this is not the be-all solution to suicides.  This is just a proposal specifically for the Vista Bridge with possible application to other bridges of similar size and scope.  In cost, probably half a million to implement fully -- not including the cost to update the handrail for accessibility.

Bad or good idea?




Monday, June 10, 2013

Apple's WWDC: The Good, the Bad and the Copied.

Good:

  • iTunes Radio is an ad-supported free radio service, or ad-free for those who pay the monthly iTunes Match service.  Google Music's All Access service is the odd-man out without a free radio service supported by ads, and probably suffering a lack of enthusiasm as a result.
  • Mac Pro redesign, designed in the US and assembled in the US.  The Xeon E5 with 12 cores hasn't yet come out, but you can expect it to be very expensive, as in $7000+ workstations.
  • New Mac Book Air models include super-power-saving Haswell CPUs.
  • New security features in iOS 7 that stops short of bricking your phone, but nonetheless makes it impossible to use it.
  • iOS 7 brings the iPhone up to par with Androids running Jelly Bean 4.1 and later.
  • Apple brings iWorks to the cloud, even if late.
Bad:
  • iOS 7 is not yet available, but Android 4.3 and 5.0 are on the clock.
Copied:
  • iOS 7 now supports animated, interactive backgrounds, copying Android's Live Wallpapers.
  • iOS 7 includes automatic updates, copying Android, which seemed like an obvious thing to do, anyway.
  • iOS 7 with Airdrop allows wireless (Bluetooth or WiFi) sharing -- something you could do (since forever) on Android, with anyone, albeit not quite as pretty as Apple's way.
  • iOS 7's Today View in notifications is similar to Google Now.  Notification availability without unlocking your phone is also the same as Google Now functionality.
  • iOS 7's Control Center pull up, is Android's Notification pull down.
Notice that there's nothing in that "Copied" list that refers to Windows Phone or Blackberry.

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Left and right, no one likes what the NSA is doing.

Watching ABC's This Week was interesting, as everyone was universally against the way our government has been prosecuting the War on Terror, as it related to spying domestically.  They all felt that these programs should have been publicly known so that we could debate their merits.  As Paul Krugman related, we look like an authoritarian state, and I agree.

As I wrote previously, there's little risk of making these programs known publicly.  Those terrorists who weren't already paranoid, were either dead or soon to be dead, and the rest were already trying their best to not be caught.  Bin Laden lived so long because he was paranoid and went dark; none of these recently revealed programs would have caught him, even if he lived in the US.

While it shouldn't surprise terrorists, it does surprise the rest of us, because we're not doing anything wrong yet our data is nonetheless being collected, sometimes accidentally.  And we have yet to know the full extent of domestic spying and data collection of American citizens.  But think about what our Canadian, Australian and other friends around the world think of us.  They have no say in whether or not their data is being collected by the NSA.  This is the hallmark of an authoritarian state, yes?

Saturday, June 8, 2013

There's more going on than the ISS passing overhead tonight.

This is more of a reference for me.  These charts (except the last one which is a compilation) come from Heavens Above -- you'll need to enter your coordinates to have their data associated to your location.  To use the maps, you hold them up above your head and orient it accordingly.  It's useful to have a smart phone with a compass, to identify 0° / 360°.

Between 9:36 pm and 11:19 pm tonight, there will be at least five different objects that will be visible above Portland Oregon.  From very bright (Irridium) to faint (X37-B), one could just sit outside and enjoy the night besides a fire pit.

ATV-4 (magnitude 1.8)

Cosmos 1220 (magnitude 1.1)

Iridium (magnitude -7.2)

ISS (magnitude -2.9)


X37-B (magnitude 2.7)

What Prism is *probably* all about.

Having read the specific denials of a backdoor from most of the companies listed under the Prism program, it's quite clear that unless they were lying, what Prism is all about, is a colocated server that separates or mirrors specific user data upon request.  Therefore, everyone else's data would not be observable, just the two-deep contacts or however deep the NSA would request.

Does the reveal of Prism harm national security?  I don't see how.  If you were doing bad things and you weren't already paranoid, you're probably already dead, caught or about to be.  You can't tell if your data is being mirrored and searched by the NSA, no matter how hard you tried, unless you were able to hack into a company's server and move about the network, but terrorists aren't in the business of being top-notch hackers.

The issue for the rest of us is to know whether or not our data was accidentally or intentionally caught up in a dragnet.  The FISA court is no safeguard against errors and accidental violations of an innocent American's 4th Amendment right -- if it happens, no one will tell you that it happened.

I imagine that many members of Congress up for reelection in 2014 (think House of Representatives) will be quiet until they figure out where the public stands, then move to take up populist positions.

Friday, June 7, 2013

May 2013 BLS jobs report = good news.

The May BLS unemployment report came out today, and as if to buoy the economy from Wednesday's ADP report of 135,000 jobs, the government report showed a gain of 175,000 jobs in May with 420,000 people rejoining the labor market in search for jobs.  As a result, even though the number of people employed had increased, the unemployment rate moved up 0.1 percentage points to 7.6%.  As they say, optimism drives people to get back into the workforce.

Good news, right?  Yes.  But that was yesterday.

Going forward we're going to hit the full blow of the sequester cuts.  To reiterate, the federal government had already been cutting jobs for years, and you can expect the federal government to continue to drag down total GDP and employment numbers.


As you can see, federal jobs have been shrinking in real numbers and as a percentage of total non-farm employment.  This is going to be a real problem as a backlog of approvals and reviews will grow concurrent to growth in the private market.

No, the NSA programs is not a black eye on Obama.

This is a curious thing.  Many people seem focused on the idea that President Obama is guilty of a lack of transparency and spying on Americans.  But the NSA's actions aren't unilateral decisions made within a fishbowl.

  • Multiple Congresses wrote and expanded upon the Patriot Act, granting expansive spying powers and leeway to go after terrorists.
  • The Supreme Court allowed for the secretive FISA court and gave the Patriot Act the greenish light to move forward.  FISA court judges approved of every one of these programs now currently outed.
  • The Executive branch under George Bush guided Congress towards their desired outcome, and built up the very domestic spying programs currently under fire.

People complain that President Obama hasn't been transparent.  Well, nothing about what the NSA is transparent, so I don't know exactly what anyone expects the White House to do differently.  If people have a complaint about the issue of transparency, they should complain to their representatives, as they're the ones responsible for writing laws, and the President is merely following the rules set up by Congress.

I definitely think these things should be aired out in the open, but Congress is reactionary, not proactive, here, and it should be telling that these people have all along been in the know from regular internal briefings.  When Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall pressed this matter obliquely in public, others just brushed off their concerns.

I was never under any illusion that President Obama was a liberal.  If he was, he would have pushed for universal health care, he would have pushed to ensure that Guantanamo was closed, he would have pushed to boost the top marginal tax rate up to 50% or higher, he would have pushed to end the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security, he would have refused to touch Social Security and Medicare, and he would have demanded action on climate change regulations.

Ron Wyden for President?

Screw you, KATU.

Carl Click this morning says, "Even though everyone you know has an iPhone..."

What sort of moron would make such presumptuous statements?  This is why I haven't been watching local news lately: full of crap.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

A thought about the NSA dragnet.

By now you probably heard about how the NSA's dragnet involving Verizon did not include personal information about owners, but that's a little misleading.  The data included IMEI and phone numbers, both of which can be used to figure out a host of information about you.

IMEI
A unique number for each and every wireless device using cellular technology, it enables all carriers to brick your phone if you report it stolen.  You can find your IMEI by either entering *#06# into your phone dialer, or checking under the battery.  Aside from being a unique identifier, it also tells someone what make and model your phone is.  All of this can help a lot if you're trying to send a targeted virus to someone that would allow you to control a phone or listen in on conversations.  It also allows you to track someone even if they change their phone number.

Phone numbers
If someone knows your phone number, then they can backward trace your phone number online to see where your phone number is located, or they can perform a paid search to find out who's associated with that phone number.  Or you can use a social engineering hack to get a carrier's customer rep to tell you who's using that phone number.  It allows you to track someone who keeps the same phone number when they switch phones.

Combined, these two identifiers allow anyone to find you and track you.  The question you have to ask yourself is, how much trust you trust your government, given that these actions are done behind the closed doors of the FISA court and the NSA.

Such powers and secrecy will eventually lead us down the road to another Watergate, and it may trigger the constitutionalization of privacy.

Microsoft's browser energy efficiency report needs a caveat.

Have a look-see at this report commissioned by Microsoft, which suggests that IE is more energy efficient than Chrome and Firefox.

Too bad they weren't consistent in how they updated the IE and FF browsers but not the Chrome browser, midway through testing:

Chrome 26.0.1410.64 (April 9);
IE 10.0.9200.16540 (April 9);
IE 10.0.9200.16580 (May 15);
FF 20.0.1.4847 (April 11);
FF 21.0.0.4879 (May 14).

For reference (stable) Chrome 27.0.1453.93 was released May 21.

Now, maybe IE 10 is more energy-efficient, but we won't really know if it was a fair test because Microsoft's browser was updated midway but Chrome's update wasn't included.  Timing issues may have been the reason, but the report wasn't released until today, and testing doesn't exactly take a day.

How to design a Web 2.0 logo and landing page, mocking.ly, of course.

Call me Cynic.ly minded, but there's a fairly easy formula to build a Web 2.0 landing page and logo:

  1. Using Photoshop, wash out a photo's vibrance and shift its color towards more blue and green and less yellow.
  2. Pick the closest-matching, light-color pastel as a highlight and find a complementary, low-tint gray shade as background.
  3. If necessary, use a pastel color in a complementary color.
  4. Use white contrasting text, in a brush-style font.
  5. Voila.

No surprise: Verizon willingly cooperates to co-opt your privacy.

It's a very disturbing and shocking story, but in some respects, no one should be surprised to know that Verizon quietly and simply handed the government call records on all of its customers.

For three years the Electronic Frontier Foundation has looked at how well various tech companies protect your data and privacy.  The only company not to score a single star during all three years?  You guessed it: Verizon.  In other words, they won't lift a finger to protect your data and privacy.

If you look closely, Apple and AT&T aren't too far behind Verizon, while Twitter and Google are on the opposite end, fighting for users in court.

Unfortunately, it means that those of us who aren't Verizon customers have also lost some of our privacy by the fact that some of our friends are on Verizon.  So, if you're on Verizon you not only pay some of the highest rates, but you have zero privacy.  Enjoy!



Also, a big thanks to Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Senator Mark Udall (D-CO) for being on the forefront, trying to warn us about what's been going on and for having our backs.  And thanks to the EFF, too.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Laughing: Conservative "economist" called out for lying.

This is amusing. I give you the lonely "economist" from the Heritage Foundation, whose own references were cross-checked to humiliate him.


I had one of these in the 80s.

Via Revolution's season finale episode, a boom box from the 80s, complete with flashing LED levels.  Just like the one I had in high school.


A little story about what meritocracy and luck really means.

A lot of people apparently think that we live in a meritocratic society and that hard work is always rewarded.  It's all bullshit.  In life, you don't get rewarded simply for hard work, and most of the time you have to have a bit of luck at the right time.  So here are some stories from my life growing up, to illustrate my case against the idea that we live in a meritocratic society.

The case against meritocracy

By demand of our mother, at the age of 11 we all took up orchestral musical instruments.  My brother played the baritone, one of my sisters played the oboe while the other played the flute.  I played the french horn.  Somehow, my elementary school band instructor must have seen talent within me, or at least the desire to excel, and helped me acquire a run down french horn that would have otherwise been tossed, and get it refurbished.

I don't know exactly why, but throughout my schooling years, I've always had to prove myself and move up from a lower chair to the top.

Always.

I was second chair in elementary school, until I won competitions.  In middle school, I was the bottom chair, but again, as soon as I started winning / placing in statewide competitions, I rose to the top, beating older students.  When I got to high school, things weren't any different and I still had to battle my way up the ladder.

Even before I got to high school, it was well known who were the best french horn players in high school, and two of them were at my high school of choice.  Well, I beat all three of them in a statewide competition, and came in second to my longtime competitor since the 7th grade.

As she told it to me, we were actually tied in scoring, but that they decided to give her the first seat.  I think she did that to irk me, but if it were true, then that was the first case against meritocracy, as we should have been co-first chairs.

Back at school, I thought that it would have impressed my band teacher that I was better, but it was not so.  He insisted on placing those who were senior to me, above me.  That was bullshit, and it went on this way for two years.  That second year, he offered to pay for private lessons, apparently as a means of compensating for promoting students who were not as good.  I foolishly rejected it, out of ego.

You have to understand, when I sat in those statewide bands and orchestras, I was the only one seated in the french horn section who didn't take private lessons, and I was usually #2 in the state, behind my longtime competitor.  It was a matter of pride that, I alone, could beat nearly every one of the other students.  Again like I said, ego got in the way.

The point is, that it didn't matter how much I proved myself in high school, my teacher would not make me first chair.  I wanted to major in music, but my mother advised against it.  When I thought about how difficult it was to swim upstream against a world devoid of meritocracy, I decided to drop playing french horn.

The case of needing luck at the right time

Back in 1993 when I graduated from USC, the economy stunk so bad in Los Angeles that for the first time in history, there were more people leaving than moving in.  Of all the cyclical occupations, Architecture / Construction and its related industries are first and foremost feast or famine.  There simply were no jobs.

I eventually made my way up to Portland Oregon by 1994, but for over a year I had been sending out my resume and micro portfolio of work to select firms that I really wanted to work for.  I had three bites during that time: Neal Denari, Coop Himmelblau and Michael Rotondi.

I remember that during my interview at Coop Himmelblau, it was clear that I had struck out, I think mostly because my portfolio was not Deconstructivist enough with exploration of layers.  But this is not about that particular interview.

I remember talking to Neal Denari on the phone, and the thrust of the conversation was, that he really liked my micro portfolio, but that he was closing up his Los Angeles office and focusing on New York.  Now, I don't know if he was lying to me, but he was really nice about it, and I'll always remember that about him.

I remember getting the letter from Michael Rotondi's office inviting me for an interview for their sole intern position, and feeling excited.  I called and spoke with the receptionist and set up a time.  I clearly remember stating that if I can't make it, that I would call her back to rearrange.  Come the day of the interview I showed up and Michael Rotondi wasn't there and the receptionist tells me that they already hired someone, because I had never called back.  WTF, right?  You see, out of the dozens of resumes they received, they had chosen just two people to interview, and I was one of those two.

So fate, it turns out, is cruel and likes to play tricks with your life.  Or as written in an once-obscure Medieval text made famous by Carl Orff's music, "O Fortune, like the moon you are changeable, ever waxing and waning."

If I hadn't graduated into a dismal economic climate or if Michael Rotondi's receptionist hadn't misheard or misunderstood me, I might have gotten a prime job, working for a world-renown, cutting-edge firm.

Instead, I moved up to Portland.

It is what it is

And you know what?  I feel no animosity, regret, or ill-will because of what happened.  In life, good luck or bad luck, bad timing or perfect timing, you can't force Fate to give you a different path.

As I recently told my mother, there is no point to wishing for things to have turned out different; it can't change, and it doesn't do any good dwelling on the past.  Further, I have many things to be thankful for, and I have been truly lucky with many other things in my life.

But I strongly resent the artificial thinking that suggests we live in a meritocratic society, and that people get ahead by working hard.  Working hard increases your opportunities to be at the right spot at the right time, but it doesn't guarantee anything.  It's similar to playing the lottery: If you play often, you're always in the running to get lucky, but if you never play, you're never going to win.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Forbes.com contributor Avik Roy is lazy.

This article on the supposed raised premiums resulting from ACA, is terribly lazy.

The map of supposed ACA Bronze price premiums over eHealthInsurance prices, does not indicate source of data.  The reason why it's important to know the data source, is because neither California nor Oregon has publicly released Bronze price rate calculations; the publicly available data is based on Silver-level price bids that were submitted by insurers who were interested in participating.  At best, as KFF shows, you know what your out of pocket costs would be, after federal subsidy.

But the chart is misleading, anyway: you can always buy on the open market, regardless.  If you do not want the federal subsidy that would vastly lower your out-of-pocket costs including your monthly premium, it's your choice.

There is an important consideration, too: insurers listing under eHealthInsurance can deny coverage based on preexisting conditions -- see the smoker's screening question when you search eHealthInsurance for plans -- until January 1, 2014.  If you try to compare prices between ACA rates and those on the open market, you're not comparing apples to apples.

An aside:

Regardless of your age, you will pay the same out-of-pocket monthly premium, if you qualify under the ACA.  Young people get lower subsidies because their total premium is lower, while older adults get higher subsidies because their total premium is higher -- something I'll cover later, perhaps, because I've read some misleading articles lately.

But the most spectacular proof of laziness, is that its author, Avik Roy "called out" a bunch of spam comments.  In other words, he's not really paying attention to comments at all, and you know what they say about a closed mind.

Avik Roy's stamp of approval on spam

April 2013 comScore US smartphone market share: Flat

comScore released their April 2013 US smart phone market share numbers.  Because of the way comScore presents its data (3-month differences to separate out its 3-month rolling average collection methods), it looks as if Blackberry has had a large decline coupled with a big spurt of growth from Apple.

Top Smartphone Platforms
3 Month Avg. Ending Apr. 2013 vs. 3 Month Avg. Ending Jan. 2013
Total U.S. Smartphone Subscribers Age 13+
Source: comScore MobiLens
Share (%) of Smartphone Subscribers
Jan-13 Apr-13 Point Change
Total Smartphone Subscribers 100.0% 100.0% N/A
Google 52.3% 52.0% -0.3
Apple 37.8% 39.2% 1.4
BlackBerry 5.9% 5.1% -0.8
Microsoft 3.1% 3.0% -0.1

But if you break the data down to month-to-month changes, since January of this year, market share fluctuations have flattened out recently, specifically since January 2013, there has been little change.

Trailing 12 months

Jan - April 2013

For Blackberry, at least it means that its market share is no longer crumbling at an incredible rate (it's still shrinking, albeit 0.1 percentage point between March and April), following its introduction of the Z10.  Seeing how so many Blackberry fans (who'd previously switched to other platforms) love the physical keyboard, the introduction of Q10 might finally result in market share growth...but don't hold your breath.

For Microsoft, it has to be severely disappointing that, despite its release of WP 8.0 in late October 2012, nothing has changed (3.0% in October 2012 and 3.0% in April 2013).  Considering that in November 2010 (the month Windows Phones were available in the US), Microsoft's total market share (combined legacy Windows Mobile and new Windows Phone) was 9.0%, and Microsoft's total market share is now 3.0%, something is not quite right.

This seems to bode favorably for Android and Apple, possibly signaling a maturity of the US smart phone market, locking in stability and market share.  The number of smart phone owners continues to grow, but it's unmistakable that the graph is closer to the top of the curve, not the middle.  It also signals that Mozilla's smart phone ambitions are probably doomed -- after all, Android and WP manufacturers can simply make cheaper phones to match a $50 Firefox phone base price, but still have access to much larger numbers of mature apps.

Monday, June 3, 2013

Have you turned Yahoo Mail's SSL on?

I didn't notice that this past January, Yahoo Mail had enabled SSL (HTTPS).  Of course, they didn't enable it across the board, rather, they hid it as an option.  Under Mail Options, in the Advanced Settings, there's a little check box to Turn on SSL.  When you check the box, you'll get a pop up window with a spelling error; hard to believe that no one has caught and fixed it.

Don't forget to hit the Save button.